Tavie
dave foley mark mckinney e.mail
archive
blogs i like:
amy
andrew
carl
barb cooking blog
boing boing
caroline
cartoon brew
chris
cityroom
consumerist
erin
gena/ deadly stealth frogs
gothamist
jim hill
kids in the hall lj
kithblog
matt k
mike t
nathan
post secret
rynn
sarah
sarah c
sean
tea rose
toby
tom
webcomics i read:
american elf
american stickman
elfquest
lolcats!
masque of the red death
the perry bible fellowship
toothpaste for dinner
ultrajoebot
xkcd
Other places to find me:
me on the tumblr
me on the flickr
me on the formspring
me on the twitter
me on the ravelry
me on the myspace
Subscribe in a reader
my 'currently-reading' shelf:
i want:
wish list
i've read:
goodreads list
| ? |
Monday, April 05, 2004
Explain this question to me:
Rewrite the following Latin sentences in two different ways, by subordinating 1 of these into the other using a relative pronoun:
Tristes cûrae mihi sunt propter victôriam.
Victôria vîtam dûram etiam hîs victôribus faciunt.
In rewriting these two Latin sentences, you have no need to add any extra words. in each case, you will replace one linking word with a relative pronoun. (2 credits)
Er... huh? Am I making those two sentences into one sentence, twice, or am I making each of those sentences into two sentences? Why are you in Tavie's head? 6:18 PM | shower me with attention
|