Tavie blogs i like:
amy | ? |
Wednesday, August 21, 2002
Name/personality analysis I got from Toronto Steph is surprisingly accurate. Except for the whole "responsible" and "self-confident" part. But other than that... right on.
Now I'll analyze the accuracy of some others. This will be limited to those people I know who don't share a name with any of my other close friends. Gina: You are stable, trustworthy, homeloving, and logical in practical matters, but rather unresponsive to suggestions from others. You resist change. This is the only really correct part. Everything else is wrong. Ade: Dead-on accurate. Kirsten: Eh. Not so much. A little on the restlessness point, but the whole "organized" thing? Nuh-uh. Cheryl: The ever-present desire to progress does not allow you proper relaxation or the proper expression of the softer feminine qualities of sympathy, encouragement, and affection. Others see you as rather shrewd and calculating. Dead-off wrong. Wrong, wrong, wrong. Erica: Pretty accurate. The possessive/jealous stuff is very wrong. Kitana: Much here is stunningly accurate, this most of all: You would be most successful in situations where you can use your skills in diplomacy in handling people. Stunningly true. Very right-on. Do they know her? Steve: Not too much of this sounds very accurate, although I could be wrong. Matt: This sounds pretty right, although some points (particularly, "too certain of yourself") are inaccurate. Goose: I'm not too sure, but most of this sounds pretty damn correct. I'm not too sure about the lack of compassion nor the businesslike nature-- in fact, yeah, those are wrong-- but, otherwise, right on. Linn: It starts out okay ( an intense desire to be of service to others,) but then veers off into the Land of Wrong (you are not especially imaginative or investigative.) Oh well. Rynn: Nope. Businesslike? Materialistic? Reticent? Tigga, please. That's it. If I left you out, it means I don't feel capable of judging you yet. Wine and dine me a little more; show me your soul. |