Tavie
dave foley
mark mckinney
e.mail
archive

blogs i like:

amy
andrew
anne marie
barb carr
barb
beth
boing boing
buddy cole
camille
caroline
cartoon brew
craig northey
crissy/alternate link
dave
disney blog
francis
polly mcaffable
gina
goose
jamie
james kochalka
Jersey City DFA
jordan
jim hill
kirsten
kithblog
liz
matt k/word du jour
mike t
passive agressive notes
patton oswalt
post secret
rule the web
rynn
sarah
sarah c
serra
soft communication
tea rose
terry
toothpaste for dinner
tilly


My Flickr account

Subscribe with Bloglines

Subscribe in a reader

my 'currently-reading' shelf:

i want:
wish list

i've read:
goodreads list

?
Friday, March 14, 2003
This may be my favourite blog entry of mine, ever. Or not. But I was looking for old posts about Lynne Thigpen, and found this on one of the pages. The background is, my darling friend Matt wrote an incredible monograph about Hedwig and the Angry Inch as the ultimate postmodern fairytale, and it reached the eyes of John Cameron Mitchell, Hedwig's creator, who was so impressed with it that he invited Matt to have dinner with him. This is the post I wrote in response to it:

Wednesday, October 03, 2001
The thing about the whole JCM thing that makes me just thrum with happiness-- well, the MAIN thing, I think there are many very obvious reasons to be happy-- is that it isn't that it's a regular fan-idol meeting. It's not that Matt won a contest. It's not that JCM is meeting him as a favour, or as a kind act from a celebrity to his fan, because JCM wants to give a kid a thrill. It's not because Matt showed up on his doorstep and JCM feels sorry for him. It's not because Matt is the president of his fan club or writes him a million fan letters a day.

It's because Matt produced a brilliant piece of writing, and it was on the strength of this creation, of this product of Matt's intellect, on the manifestation of Matt's genius, that this godlike idol-figure felt compelled to contact him. It's a beautiful thing, almost beyond expression. It's an inversion of the normal processes of fan-relations; who is a fan of whom here? Who appreciates whose work?


I think about fandom a lot. There's lots of angst, lots of thumbings through Henry Jenkins' Textual Poachers. There's lots of self-deprecation and justification, of intellectualizing of fannish activities and theorizing about fan creativity and formation of communities. There's lots of mooning and sighing. Fandom is so much larger a part of my life than I ever would have wished that I can't help but continually analyze it and its place in the culture and subcultures in which I find myself, and wonder about its place in my own self-identification process. Therefore it has a large emotional significance for me, and so when something like this happens, it makes my heart so light.


So light.

Why are you in Tavie's head? 10:46 PM


This is why cyberanthropology is my field. It's all tied up in fandom and empowerment and charisma and everything that has made me a distintinctive personality. You can see the connections, can't you? They're shimmering in front of my eyes like spiderwebs, now. Something's happening.